The following open letter has been jointly sent to the German government by ILGA-Europe, the European Network Against Racism, European Disability Forum and Age Platform Europe.

Dear Chancellor Scholz,

We are writing to you today as a coalition of European NGO networks working on equality and non-discrimination, representing thousands of organisations of LGBTI people, people with disabilities, racialised people, the young and older people. Together with many other human rights organisations we are very concerned  that while a large majority of EU Member States supported the efforts of the Belgian Presidency to finally ensure that the EU’s draft Equal Treatment Directive (2008/0140(CNS)) gets adopted after 14 years of stalling in the Council, it was yet again your government that blocked any progress by not lifting the general reservation.

Considering your strong commitment to advancing equal rights, as well as a clear passage in the coalition agreement that commits to supporting the broadening of anti-discrimination legislation on EU level to include LGBTI people (Überschrift Queeres Leben S.95 des Koalitionsvertrags: „Rechtsakte der EU, die gegen Diskriminierung aufgrund von Rassismus gelten, müssen künftig auch Homophobie und andere Diskriminierung umfasse“), the ongoing general reservation of your Government is cause for concern. Lifting your Government’s blockage would also be an important step to protect older persons from discrimination, another commitment made in the coalition agreement (Überschrift Senioren: “Wir werden ältere Menschen vor Diskriminierung und vor finanzieller Ausbeutung– insb. durch Vorsorgevollmachten – schützen“).

This directive, which represents one step towards more equality, has not reached agreement in the Council for 14 years now. One major blocking stone of any negotiation between Member States has been the general reservation of Germany. In 2024, people living in the EU, especially those at the intersections of inequalities are still not equally protected by law when they experience discrimination in all spheres of life because of their age, gender/sex, belief or religion, sexual orientation, disability, race or ethnic origin. For the moment, across the EU, there is a patchwork of unequal protection, with negative consequences for individuals, businesses and Member States themselves. At a time when acts of racism,  xenophobia, LGBTI-phobia and sexism are on the rise across the EU, this absence of legislative action towards more equality by EU Member States is highly problematic.

What is more, the results of the European elections on 9^th June 2024, have shown quite clearly that in many EU Member States the far-right is on the rise and upcoming national elections might further shift the majorities in the Council. Laws and policies are too often the last line of defence for minorities in our societies. In a social and political context which is increasingly polarised and makes them particularly vulnerable this is further exacerbated. However, there still is a window of opportunity now to finally adopt the Equal Treatment Directive which might close very soon if the governments of more Member States shift to the right.

Amid a surge in far-right political parties gaining seats in the new European Parliament, with gains also at national level expected, the new compositions of the European Parliament and Council will have serious consequences on EU decision making. This is a critical time for the EU and its Member States to fulfil their obligations to ensure that better protection against discrimination in all areas of live is put down in law on EU level, adding to the protection of EU fundamental rights.

For over a decade now, people across the EU hear again and again that Germany could not lift its general reservation due to disagreements in the government. Your Government has clearly committed to furthering equality and non-discrimination in Germany, at the EU level and the United Nations. After the elections in Poland, the Polish Government has changed its position on the directive, and made a very clear statement in the EPSCO on the 20 June that they want to adopt the directive as soon as possible, as did many other Member States. In the final weeks of the Belgian Presidency, the German Government has a unique opportunity to put the commitment of its coalition agreement finally into action.  

We therefore urge your Government to lift the general reservation as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

ILGA-Europe

European Network Against Racism

European Disability Forum Age Platform Europe

The submission covers developments in eight EU Member States as regards rule of law developments in the countries which have had an impact on the fundamental rights of LGBTI people and their democratic participation, with a focus on the past year (2022).

We have kept our inputs relevant to the content asked for by the consultation, and therefore we have not included all fundamental rights violations against LGBTI people, or all restrictions experienced by LGBTI civil society in the respective countries. We have only included them where there is a clear link to the issues of rule of law contained in the consultation.

Notably the submission covers the following topics:

• Manipulation of judicial processes to attempt to erode the human rights of LGBTI people and their access to justice;
• Politicians attempting to discredit and delegitimise the rulings of courts that uphold the rights of LGBTI people;
• Harassment and intimidation of LGBTI human rights defenders by law enforcement/prosecution services;
• Smear campaigns and negative narratives against LGBTI people, particularly where independence of media is threatened;
• SLAPPs against activists or journalists reporting on topics of public interest related to LGBTI;
• Censorship of LGBTI content;
• Tabling and adoption of laws aiming to reduce fundamental rights of LGBTI people;
• Tabling of laws aimed at restricting the functioning of civil society organistions;
• Arbitrary application of Covid-19 regulations to attempt to restrict the freedom of assembly of LGBTI people;
• Continued non-implementation of CJEU or ECtHR judgements which would improve the lives of LGBTI people;
• Anti-LGBTI discriminatory speech from political and religious leaders affecting public perception of LGBTI CSOs and creating an unsafe climate for LGBTI human rights defenders;
• Insufficient implementation of legal protection (e.g. protection against hate crime) for LGBTI people by responsible services, sometimes including Ombudspersons.

Recognition of trans parenthood.

Submitted jointly by ILGA-Europe, TGEU, and Bundesverband Trans*.

Find here the communicated case.

The Court made its decision on 4 April 2023, which found that it is within the State’s discretion to list a trans parent on their child’s birth certificate using a “deadname” and sex assigned at birth.

Legal gender recognition

(Apps. nos. 53568/18 and 54741/18), 25 June 2019

Find here the communicated case.

• The case concerns a transgender man who gave birth and applied to be registered as father to his child. The German authorities refused his request and registered him instead as mother under his former female forename.
• ILGA-Europe together with TGEU submitted the following:
  • Restrictive LGR procedures hinder the ability of trans people to enjoy their family life. The law is often not adapted to their situations, as trans parents are frequently forced to disclose their trans identity because of a mismatch between public records and the children’s birth certificate.
  • In 2018, the Parliamentary Assembly adopted a resolution asking States to provide for transgender parents’ gender identity to be correctly recorded on their children’s birth certificates. The Yogyakarta Principles specify that “States shall issue birth certificates for children upon birth that reflect the self-defined gender identity of the parents.”
  • In Germany, the state de facto dictates a single possible parenting structure, enforces gender norms (a pregnant person is always a mother) and erases the lived reality of other possibilities. Consequently, birth certificates are often contradictory to the reality, forcing trans parents to reveal their trans identity, thus leading to frequent discriminatory and degrading treatments against trans parents and their children in their daily life.
• The Court made its decision on 4 April 2023, which found that it is within the State’s discretion to list a trans parent on their child’s birth certificate using a “deadname” and sex assigned at birth.

On 15 August, the Federal Government of germany adopted a draft bill on a third gender option. This bill is a missed opportunity to recognise the right to self-determination of trans, intersex and all gender-diverse people. 

German legislators were requested by the Constitutional Court, following its decision of October 2017, to amend the law on gender registration. The Court provided two possible scenarios: either the Government introduces a “third” non-binary legal gender category or it abolishes the registration of gender altogether. The mandate for drafting the German personal status law amendment lies with the Ministry of Interior, currently led by Horst Seehofer, who is one of the leadings politicians of the conservative party Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU).

In June, an early draft of the law was sent to main organizations working on trans and inter issues in order to receive a statement about the draft by July. The two main worrying elements were that the introduction of a “third” gender category was limited to people who present a medical certificate confirming “Differences of Sexual Development“ and that this new gender category would be named “weiteres”, which translates into “other” in English. The draft released on 15 August has improved at least on one of those two points, as it now refers to “diverse” for the name of this new category instead of “other”. However, the third gender category is still only reserved for a specific group of intersex people who can provide a specific medical certificate on “Differences of Sexual Development“.

It means that we are still very far from the introduction of a non-binary legal gender category open for all non-binary persons on the basis of self-determination, which is what the German institute of Human Rights had proposed after consulting trans and intersex groups. We’re also very far from the spirit of the Constitutional Court decision, which explicitly declares that the German Constitution protects the fundamental rights of persons identifying neither female nor male.

The law must now be adopted by the Bundestag and the Bundesrat before entering into force. We call on the Members of the Parliament to amend this draft bill so that it fully respects the fundamental rights of people who would like to make use of this law. We also call on the Government to as soon as possible prohibit unnecessary medical treatments on intersex children and to propose a revision of the current law on legal gender recognition, to bring it in line with the current human rights standards.